<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Database Management Systems Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:14:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert SImms</title>
		<link>http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392/comment-page-1#comment-9487</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert SImms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392#comment-9487</guid>
		<description>I honestly don&#039;t know what software you may be talking about.  Most software used may be proprietary in that their code is secret, but the way data is stored is relatively universal.  Most use a relational database like (MS SQL, Oracle, IBM DB2, MySQL, etc.) That data can be exported to nearly any conceivable format.  The problem is that in a relational database system, records do not exist in the way people think.  Each field in a &quot;record&quot; may reside in a different table.  To create the &quot;record&quot; the program or programmer will have to pull the proper information together.  Why do we need to do this?  Because it is more efficient.  I can share information between applications and only have to update it once rather than updating several databases containing the same data.  

But again, what does &quot;easily accessed and manipulated by programs commonly available to the public.&quot; mean?  I hope you understand that I&#039;m truly trying to figure this out, because replacing the software that we run (if it doesn&#039;t meet this nebulous standard) could cost millions in terms of software, hardware and staff time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly don&#039;t know what software you may be talking about.  Most software used may be proprietary in that their code is secret, but the way data is stored is relatively universal.  Most use a relational database like (MS SQL, Oracle, IBM DB2, MySQL, etc.) That data can be exported to nearly any conceivable format.  The problem is that in a relational database system, records do not exist in the way people think.  Each field in a &#8220;record&#8221; may reside in a different table.  To create the &#8220;record&#8221; the program or programmer will have to pull the proper information together.  Why do we need to do this?  Because it is more efficient.  I can share information between applications and only have to update it once rather than updating several databases containing the same data.  </p>
<p>But again, what does &#8220;easily accessed and manipulated by programs commonly available to the public.&#8221; mean?  I hope you understand that I&#039;m truly trying to figure this out, because replacing the software that we run (if it doesn&#039;t meet this nebulous standard) could cost millions in terms of software, hardware and staff time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg DesElms</title>
		<link>http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392/comment-page-1#comment-8345</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg DesElms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392#comment-8345</guid>
		<description>You get OUT of anything in life no more than you put INTO it.

You might want to look back on your cavalier admission of laziness and ask yourself what&#039;s wrong with this picture.  THAT, it seems to me, is what YOU need to &quot;learn rather quickly.&quot;

As to the course...

No matter how good a programmer someone might be, his/her custom application of slick code sitting atop a lousy database design will be a bust.  Database design is its own kind of art form.  This course, clearly, covers much of what one needs to know in order to create a good and flexible database structure before one begins writing the code to make it functional and useful.

A very, very simple example of bad database design:  Not separating the name field into logical sub-parts.  In other words, not having a &quot;First Name&quot; field, and then a separate &quot;Middle Name or Initial&quot; field, and then a separate &quot;Last Name&quot; field.  If one puts the entire first, middle and last name into the same field, then how, later, does one print-out a report wherein the name is in the format &quot;last-comma-first&quot;?

Of course, one can write a semi-sophisticated parsing algorithm, but no amount of sophistication can successfully cope with things like last names which have spaces in them, for example.  Computers join things together really well, but they don&#039;t bust them apart very accurately.  Good database design, therefore, ensures that all data is broken down and stored in said database in the smallest and most logical constituent parts possible so it will be easier for the computer to put things back together however one desired it at report time.

That is the kind of stuff that that course teaches... only, obviously, including much, much more sophisticated stuff than my simple example.  I&#039;m just trying to help you understand the essence of it.

Databases have parts which &quot;relate&quot; to one another so that one doesn&#039;t have to keep entering the same information over and over into different parts of the system.  Building and organizing those parts can be tricky.  If not done right, the database will be cumbersome to use, and slow.  Good structural and access optimzation techniques are called for to figure it all out... and that means a lot of &quot;what if&quot; kind of mathematics... hence the requirement for algebra and calculus.

This is not the sort of course in which one may be &quot;lazy.&quot;  If you&#039;re not prepared to do the work, then don&#039;t take the course.

Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You get OUT of anything in life no more than you put INTO it.</p>
<p>You might want to look back on your cavalier admission of laziness and ask yourself what&#039;s wrong with this picture.  THAT, it seems to me, is what YOU need to &quot;learn rather quickly.&quot;</p>
<p>As to the course&#8230;</p>
<p>No matter how good a programmer someone might be, his/her custom application of slick code sitting atop a lousy database design will be a bust.  Database design is its own kind of art form.  This course, clearly, covers much of what one needs to know in order to create a good and flexible database structure before one begins writing the code to make it functional and useful.</p>
<p>A very, very simple example of bad database design:  Not separating the name field into logical sub-parts.  In other words, not having a &quot;First Name&quot; field, and then a separate &quot;Middle Name or Initial&quot; field, and then a separate &quot;Last Name&quot; field.  If one puts the entire first, middle and last name into the same field, then how, later, does one print-out a report wherein the name is in the format &quot;last-comma-first&quot;?</p>
<p>Of course, one can write a semi-sophisticated parsing algorithm, but no amount of sophistication can successfully cope with things like last names which have spaces in them, for example.  Computers join things together really well, but they don&#039;t bust them apart very accurately.  Good database design, therefore, ensures that all data is broken down and stored in said database in the smallest and most logical constituent parts possible so it will be easier for the computer to put things back together however one desired it at report time.</p>
<p>That is the kind of stuff that that course teaches&#8230; only, obviously, including much, much more sophisticated stuff than my simple example.  I&#039;m just trying to help you understand the essence of it.</p>
<p>Databases have parts which &quot;relate&quot; to one another so that one doesn&#039;t have to keep entering the same information over and over into different parts of the system.  Building and organizing those parts can be tricky.  If not done right, the database will be cumbersome to use, and slow.  Good structural and access optimzation techniques are called for to figure it all out&#8230; and that means a lot of &quot;what if&quot; kind of mathematics&#8230; hence the requirement for algebra and calculus.</p>
<p>This is not the sort of course in which one may be &quot;lazy.&quot;  If you&#039;re not prepared to do the work, then don&#039;t take the course.</p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AREA51MAJESTIC</title>
		<link>http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392/comment-page-1#comment-6734</link>
		<dc:creator>AREA51MAJESTIC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392#comment-6734</guid>
		<description>- 600 pages of﻿ translation,  and&lt;br/&gt;   your  accomplishments would be what ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- 600 pages of﻿ translation,  and<br />   your  accomplishments would be what ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitfistorocks47</title>
		<link>http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392/comment-page-1#comment-6166</link>
		<dc:creator>kitfistorocks47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392#comment-6166</guid>
		<description>i﻿ smiled through this whole video!!!! FREAKIN AWESOME!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i﻿ smiled through this whole video!!!! FREAKIN AWESOME!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodcockmu jellice</title>
		<link>http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392/comment-page-1#comment-5237</link>
		<dc:creator>goodcockmu jellice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392#comment-5237</guid>
		<description>شكراً  الله يجعلك في الجنة آمين</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>شكراً  الله يجعلك في الجنة آمين</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winski sao</title>
		<link>http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392/comment-page-1#comment-4214</link>
		<dc:creator>winski sao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392#comment-4214</guid>
		<description>Aaaah gampaaang, serahkan semua ama gw!!haaha RT ehh anjiss beneran nih kita rabu ngerjain &lt;b&gt;dbms&lt;/b&gt; ama radhi..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaah gampaaang, serahkan semua ama gw!!haaha RT ehh anjiss beneran nih kita rabu ngerjain <b>dbms</b> ama radhi..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packbeile cashiaper</title>
		<link>http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392/comment-page-1#comment-2930</link>
		<dc:creator>packbeile cashiaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 22:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392#comment-2930</guid>
		<description>Very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hambowlina surupperma</title>
		<link>http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392/comment-page-1#comment-1601</link>
		<dc:creator>hambowlina surupperma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chunkydunkin.com/blog/archives/392#comment-1601</guid>
		<description>thanks you!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks you!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

